1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Search Engine Cache Isn't Copyright Infringement

Discussion in 'News' started by tripwire45, Oct 24, 2008.

  1. tripwire45
    Honorary Member

    tripwire45 Zettabyte Poster


    Search Engine Cache Isn't Copyright Infringement

    There are some out there who have suggested that search engines such as Google and Yahoo are basically just massive copyright violators, because they scan, index and keep an archive of websites. That copied archive (usually called a cache) is, according to these commenters, an unauthorized copy. Now a court has basically destroyed that argument, noting that putting content online is giving an implicit license for search engines to index and copy. The lawsuit also claimed that individuals who visited the cached version were also infringers -- but the court also rejected that argument, claiming that the implied license extends to those users. The only part of the case that seems to be moving forward is whether or not this implicit license was broken after the lawsuit started and search engines still didn't take down the content.

    Full story at TechDirt.com.
    Certifications: A+ and Network+


    Share This Page