Testking is Soo Unreliable!

Discussion in 'MCDST' started by asanthadenz, Jan 30, 2008.

  1. Tinus1959

    Tinus1959 Gigabyte Poster

    1,539
    42
    106
    And even when they stopped, the market is full of "old" stolen questions. MS would have a enormous task to replace all these questions.
    What if I tell you that president Bush is sleeping in pink and is smoking pot. You slap me on the hand not to tell this anymore.
    The deed has been done allready and mister Bush has allready been damaged.
    These guys should get prisoned.
     
    Certifications: See my signature
    WIP: MCSD, MCAD, CCNA, CCNP
  2. Tinus1959

    Tinus1959 Gigabyte Poster

    1,539
    42
    106
    I second that!
     
    Certifications: See my signature
    WIP: MCSD, MCAD, CCNA, CCNP
  3. greenbrucelee
    Highly Decorated Member Award

    greenbrucelee Zettabyte Poster

    14,292
    265
    329
    I agree, you can get stolen TK tests from other sources as you can with them all so if TK really isn't doing the real tests someone else is supplying them under the TK name.

    and I doubt Bush is smoking pot he's too dumb to figure out which end of the spliff goes in his mouth :D only joking Bush fans
     
    Certifications: A+, N+, MCDST, Security+, 70-270
    WIP: 70-620 or 70-680?
  4. Sparky
    Highly Decorated Member Award 500 Likes Award

    Sparky Zettabyte Poster Moderator

    10,718
    543
    364
    Most of the original BD TK stuff is probably available in other BD material anyway from different distributors. Will be interesting to see how many questions get ripped off from the new Server 2008 exams in the future, hopefully none! 8)
     
    Certifications: MSc MCSE MCSA:M MCSA:S MCITP:EA MCTS(x5) MS-900 AZ-900 Security+ Network+ A+
    WIP: Microsoft Certs
  5. BosonMichael
    Honorary Member Highly Decorated Member Award 500 Likes Award

    BosonMichael Yottabyte Poster

    19,183
    500
    414
    What he said.

    If Testking had competent authors who could create high-quality practice exam content, they wouldn't have had to resort to stealing exam questions in the first place. As far as I'm concerned, they will always be a braindump.
     
    Certifications: CISSP, MCSE+I, MCSE: Security, MCSE: Messaging, MCDST, MCDBA, MCTS, OCP, CCNP, CCDP, CCNA Security, CCNA Voice, CNE, SCSA, Security+, Linux+, Server+, Network+, A+
    WIP: Just about everything!
  6. asanthadenz

    asanthadenz Bit Poster

    28
    0
    12
    Passed my 70-272 exam with a passing mark of 890.

    Took the exam and didn'f find a single question the slightest similar to TESTKING, so that proves Testking is a waste of software!

    Thank god i did some few example tests in Trancender as i found the material in that software helped alot in the exam it self... So i recommend Trancender :D!

    Now to go back and get the 70-271 over and done with, and with the 2nd chance promotion, im not in the slightest nervous about taking it.
     
    Certifications: MCDST
    WIP: MCITP
  7. asanthadenz

    asanthadenz Bit Poster

    28
    0
    12
    Oh it's not just the ONE typo, theres another question in there that relates to the Importation of Outlook Express emails, and the answer was to Import .PST, instead of .DBX, kinda weird typo :P..
     
    Certifications: MCDST
    WIP: MCITP
  8. Fergal1982

    Fergal1982 Petabyte Poster

    4,196
    172
    211
    ummm. Thats exactly what I would use to import/export emails. the pst files.
     
    Certifications: ITIL Foundation; MCTS: Visual Studio Team Foundation Server 2010, Administration
    WIP: None at present
  9. asanthadenz

    asanthadenz Bit Poster

    28
    0
    12
    Err haha, read the question properly buddy :D, "Outlook Express"

    Outlook express don't use PST's, they use DBX files, only Microsoft Outlook XP-2007 use PST format :D, 2 different programs..
     
    Certifications: MCDST
    WIP: MCITP
  10. Fergal1982

    Fergal1982 Petabyte Poster

    4,196
    172
    211
    ok, fair point, something i wouldnt particularly know, since i have never used, nor had to support, OE.

    But my point stands. You brought one typo to the table, and complained about TK's new materials. That alone isnt really grounds to tear the new TK material apart. Bringing more to the table give you better justification. Particularly when that material is outright wrong, as opposed to a simple typo.
     
    Certifications: ITIL Foundation; MCTS: Visual Studio Team Foundation Server 2010, Administration
    WIP: None at present

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.