need help in routing

Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(

This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running. Blocking our ads means your killing our stats!
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.

i use cisco packet tracer to setup the network, all the light change to green color, but still fail to ping, can some 1 help me??

i attrach the packet tracer file, can some 1 help me check it???

i wan go know which part i set wrongly

routing table :

Device interface ip address subnet mask default gateway
R1 fa/0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 N/A
s0/0/0 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 N/A
R2 fa/0 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 N/A
s0/0/0 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 N/A
PC1 N/A 192.168.1.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1
PC2 N/A 192.168.3.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1

 

Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(

This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running. Blocking our ads means your killing our stats!
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.

Hi,

I am unable to open the file you have attached, but looking at what you have put as your routing table makes no sense - all you have provided is ip addresses and the subnet masks of the interfaces and not a routing table.

First thing to do is a SH IP INT BRIEF to confirm that the status and protocol is UP on your interfaces - (Note: you may not have the clock rate set on one of your serial interfaces)

The command you are looking for is: SH IP ROUTE to get your routing table. You may have nothing set there or it is only partially set up (e.g. a static route going from R1 to R2 but not back from R2 to R1 or an incorrectly configure routing protocol) - this would cause your devices not to ping - try a tracert from one of the PC's and see where the packet dies if it is the local router then that will confirm it.

If my assumption on your routing table is correct try the following:

On R1 under global configuration mode:
IP ROUTE 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2

On R2 under global configuration mode:
IP ROUTE 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1

(Alternatively, if you are just using two routers you could put in default routes to the other router)

If none of the above helps PM me your Show Running-config of both routers and I will see what I can do.

My last piece of advice is to go back through your notes/ books and other study material and understand the concepts and what is required to get this to work and then practice it.

Good Luck

Crazy Horse

 

hello

i could not open r1 bec there is a pssword but i think 90% R1 does not have a route to get to PC1

on router 1 u can do

R1(config)#ip route 192.168.1.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1

just use static route or any protocol
thank u

 

Hi Conf T,

Thanks for the reply to this post, however it seems the OP hasn't come back yet. I am intrigued by your answer though:

Firstly according to the OP, R1 has a directly connected interface with the IP 192.168.1.0/24 so why would R1 need to route to itself? Secondly, why in this situation would you want to limit the destination prefix to a singular IP address and not the whole subnet?

The only way your answer could be right (taking the OP's original post and without the destination prefix) is if this command was completed on R2.....which I am pretty sure I stated in my previous post.

Thanks,
Crazy Horse

 

hello

this is his project



Mr.crazy horse
i was answering as i saw in the project i didn' look to his post
his proplem that he can't ping from pc0 to pc1

i did tracert from pc 0

it apears he can reach only to its getway but he cant reach the other sid of the router

so it means R1 has to have a route 2 PC1

he can do it by using routing protocol in both routers
or he can us static route in both routers

thank u

 

It would appear that chyeeqi didn't label their routers very well in their original post.

Router0 is R1 and Router1 is R2 in my post. So we are both correct - except for the destination prefix, I still do not understand that.

Yes he could use default routes or a routing protocol to resolve this, but as it is 6 weeks since the original post I suspect he isn't coming back.

Thanks,
Crazy Horse