Longhorn May Be A Yearly Subscription Service?

Discussion in 'Software' started by Mitzs, Apr 29, 2005.

  1. Mitzs
    Honorary Member

    Mitzs Ducktape Goddess

    3,286
    85
    152
    You guys are welcome to add your 2 cents if you like.

    http://www.tech-unity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5716&page=1&pp=10
     
    Certifications: Microcomputers and network specialist.
    WIP: Adobe DW, PS
  2. tripwire45
    Honorary Member

    tripwire45 Zettabyte Poster

    13,493
    180
    287
    Gee mitzs...wonder where you snagged *that* piece of info? :tongue
     
    Certifications: A+ and Network+
  3. Stu_C

    Stu_C Byte Poster

    113
    1
    34
    Im sure this move will persuade people to move to other operating systems or just stick with what they have. i know i for one, will not be paying a subscription for an OS.

    Stu_C
     
    Certifications: Bsc(Bronze Swimming Certificate)
    WIP: C# MCP, MCAD
  4. AJ

    AJ 01000001 01100100 01101101 01101001 01101110 Administrator

    6,897
    182
    221
    We pay a yearly agreement already, as part of our "Schools Agreement".

    I think we pay a fee for each computer whether or not it is a pc just that it is on the network. There is a set fee for the OS, Office, server licences and loads of other M$ stuff we use. We have something like 600 machines in the school (inc servers) and we pay something like £22K per year to licences.
     
    Certifications: MCSE, MCSA (messaging), ITIL Foundation v3
    WIP: Breathing in and out, but not out and in, that's just wrong
  5. tripwire45
    Honorary Member

    tripwire45 Zettabyte Poster

    13,493
    180
    287
    Certifications: A+ and Network+
  6. Mitzs
    Honorary Member

    Mitzs Ducktape Goddess

    3,286
    85
    152
    First I think it is crap the prices they charge for schools to use their products. A bussiness, yes, a school, no!
    And I really don't want to pay for an os on home comp either.
     
    Certifications: Microcomputers and network specialist.
    WIP: Adobe DW, PS
  7. tripwire45
    Honorary Member

    tripwire45 Zettabyte Poster

    13,493
    180
    287
    I think you mean you'd rather not pay a yearly subscription. Obviously, if you buy a company's product, they have the right to charge you a fee to purchase it. Of course, you could just download Fedora Core 3 for free and be done with it. :tongue
     
    Certifications: A+ and Network+
  8. punkboy101
    Honorary Member

    punkboy101 Back from the wilderness

    942
    2
    62
    Well, this woudl be an extremly bad move for M$. With all the competion that M$ has emerging on the market, there are allot of alternative cheap or free OS's. A move such as this would simply push lot's of people into the waiting arms of competitors. M$ already charge way to much for their products if you ask me.

    I'm with stu_c on this one, I would not pay a yearly fee to have the pleasure of constantly patching an OS. lol
     
    Certifications: CCNA
    WIP: Nada
  9. Mitzs
    Honorary Member

    Mitzs Ducktape Goddess

    3,286
    85
    152
    Well, I was really looking forward to longhorn. But not if I have to pay every year to use it. I can't afford that. And If I have to learn and use linux bitch mode will not even be the word for me...
     
    Certifications: Microcomputers and network specialist.
    WIP: Adobe DW, PS
  10. Stu_C

    Stu_C Byte Poster

    113
    1
    34
    i remember reading somewhere that longhorn was to have a popular antivirus package built in. Maybe this is the subscription they are refering to?
     
    Certifications: Bsc(Bronze Swimming Certificate)
    WIP: C# MCP, MCAD
  11. drum_dude

    drum_dude Gigabyte Poster

    1,664
    92
    135
    Hi all

    Well so far it appears to be rumour...I doubt that M$ are dumb enough to put themselves out of business...especially after coming this far! But then again, people said that the Titanic was unsinkable...so who knows? I for one am looking forward to Longhorns release...with baited breath...lol :)!!!

    As for dishing out money for OS's, XP Pro is the only Os I have actually bought. I decided to purchase it because I noticed, in 2003, that M$ had got out of the habit of releasing an OS every year. So 100 sheets was worth it for an os with what looks to be a 5 year life span! If M$ could stick to this sort of doctrine then I'm sure, just like XP, longhorn will be a winner.

    I suppose we will see...

    Cheers

    Sacha
     
    Certifications: MCP, MCSA 2000 , N+, A+ ,ITIL V2, MCTS, MCITP Lync 2010 & MCSA 2008, Sonus SATP SBC 1k/2k
    WIP: Hopefully Skype for Business and some Exchange stuff...
  12. noelg24

    noelg24 Terabyte Poster

    3,334
    26
    139
    well i am sorry but I wouldnt pay a subscription fee for any OS let alone MS own. it will only make people want to use other Os's or stick the one they already have. I am looking forward to Longhorn being released but if its going to be a yearly charge then this is one sucker who wont buy it...sort it out Bill how much more money do you want?
     
    Certifications: A+
    WIP: my life
  13. AJ

    AJ 01000001 01100100 01101101 01101001 01101110 Administrator

    6,897
    182
    221
    I think we pay something in the region of £22k (approx $40k) and that gives us the rights to most of the M$ apps for use in school and for staff to use for work purposes at home (ahem :oops: ). Plus we will get Longhorn when it comes out for free?????


    I went to a show a couple of years ago and the M$ rep was talking about licencing. He said that M$ products are actually free and that you pay for the licence to use that product. So if that is the case then the yearly subscription fee is just a logical extension of that. Agree or disagree what worries me is that we are all going to study for the M$ exams in one form or another and this is just another expence that our pockets are going to shell out for. :x
     
    Certifications: MCSE, MCSA (messaging), ITIL Foundation v3
    WIP: Breathing in and out, but not out and in, that's just wrong
  14. JonnyMX

    JonnyMX Petabyte Poster

    5,257
    220
    236
    I've seen a work-in-progress version of Longhorn and it's great. It looks as if it will 'evolve' from Win 2003 by installing a few service packs. While that's great for 2003 users, as it will be a seamless transition, it means that like XP service pack 2 it will be really hard to stop your business getting it if you don't want it...
    So if they do charge an annual subscription there's not much anyone can do about it. Spooky.
    I'd be surprised if Microsoft did make such a radical departure from their normal licensing arrangement.
    I know they have a fearsome money-grabbing reputation (allegedly) but if you join their partner program or look at their training material it's amazing what they just give away.
     
    Certifications: MCT, MCTS, i-Net+, CIW CI, Prince2, MSP, MCSD
  15. JonnyMX

    JonnyMX Petabyte Poster

    5,257
    220
    236
    Oh, and yes, it will be early.
    (That's Microsoft speak for 'on time')
     
    Certifications: MCT, MCTS, i-Net+, CIW CI, Prince2, MSP, MCSD
  16. Mitzs
    Honorary Member

    Mitzs Ducktape Goddess

    3,286
    85
    152
    Johnny do you work for ms or just a big supporter of them?
     
    Certifications: Microcomputers and network specialist.
    WIP: Adobe DW, PS
  17. Phoenix
    Honorary Member

    Phoenix 53656e696f7220 4d6f64

    5,749
    200
    246
    its nice to actually see some mature discussion rather than the pathetic microsoft bashing you see on most other forums, thanks for your input johnny,
    i've also played about with the longhorn test builds, although to be honest it looks pretty much like XP with a side bar, and with the features they are chopping out left right and center, half the exciting under the hood stuff has gone, so perhaps it is just XP with a sidebar lol
    the Avalon stuff looks very interesting, as DID the WinFS which they have apparantly dropped from longhorn in exchange for NTFS with transaction logs or the like, sounds interesting, basically it will enable better performand by writing transactions in blocks rather than all the time, if its intelligent enough it should be able to re arange thsoe transactions so that those on similar portions of the disk write together, although that may be passed off to hardware functionality such as NCQ on the newer SATA disks
     
    Certifications: MCSE, MCITP, VCP
    WIP: > 0
  18. JonnyMX

    JonnyMX Petabyte Poster

    5,257
    220
    236
    Supporter. Thing is, when you decide to get certified you generally have to take the Microsoft route.
    You may as well embrace it whole heartedly and reap the benefits, rather than fight it. Action Pack gives you about £16,000 worth of software for a tiny annual subscription along with all the news and updates you ever need. Have you had a play with their virtual labs? They're free too.
    I know plenty of people who are pro Microsoft, and plenty who are completely anti. I can tell you who has the easier life.
     
    Certifications: MCT, MCTS, i-Net+, CIW CI, Prince2, MSP, MCSD
  19. JonnyMX

    JonnyMX Petabyte Poster

    5,257
    220
    236
    BTW.
    Anyone else notice the sudden end to the Windows 2000 lifespan? Ending June for client and November for server...
    This looks like an effort to get everyone on to 2003 before Longhorn.
     
    Certifications: MCT, MCTS, i-Net+, CIW CI, Prince2, MSP, MCSD

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.