Regarding FSMO Roles?

Discussion in 'Windows Server 2003 / 2008 / 2012 / 2016' started by stolenblessing, Jun 3, 2008.

  1. stolenblessing

    stolenblessing Nibble Poster

    60
    0
    21
    Hi all,

    Is it possible to have stand-by FSMO role server in a Windows Server 2003 domain?

    I don't understand the following statement (mentioned in Microsoft KB: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223346/):

    On a per-domain basis, select local primary and standby FSMO domain controllers in case a failure occurs on the primary FSMO owner.

    Plz help me to clear the confusion..

    Regards,
     
    Certifications: CCNA, MCP (70-290)
    WIP: 70-291
  2. fortch

    fortch Kilobyte Poster

    408
    21
    35
    Petri
     
    Certifications: A+,Net+,Sec+,MCSA:Sec,MCSE:Sec,mASE
  3. stolenblessing

    stolenblessing Nibble Poster

    60
    0
    21
    This is what I understand from what you have mentioned.
    Creating a stand-by Operations Master is nothing more than configuring a direct replication partner.

    Is my understanding correct?
     
    Certifications: CCNA, MCP (70-290)
    WIP: 70-291
  4. fortch

    fortch Kilobyte Poster

    408
    21
    35
    Yes, for the most part, a direct replication partner in the same site. Honestly, I don't know how often this is implemented in practice, but it certainly makes sense.
     
    Certifications: A+,Net+,Sec+,MCSA:Sec,MCSE:Sec,mASE

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.