JFK

Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(

This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running. Blocking our ads means your killing our stats!
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.

I may be wrong but didn't Congress announce they were actually going to release them this year, in 1992?

It just happened be when that F***wit was in office.

 

ISS is fake too. Tim Peake never went to space, he is an Astronot!!

 

He does some great green screen work though !

 

I think you are the only other person that has mentioned his fabulous "Green Screen" work. You are truly deep in that rabbit hole.

The fakery is impressive.

 

Aliens, as you think of them, do not exist.

 

I think we should have a conspiracy forum as well.

Its quite good to see other peoples points of view, whether they agree or not

 

Moon hoax

 

I believe planes did hit the towers but people high up knew it was happening and let it happen. As for WTC7 lots of debris hit it which caused it to be de-stabilized then it was demolished by explosives. As for JFK there had to be two shooters as the impact of the major head shot came from opposite to where the book depository was and the weapon used must have been more powerful than the one oswald had since Kennedy's head exploded on the right hand side meaning the shooter was on the left.

Never believe the official story of anything.

 

1. WTC 7 Controlled demolition, which means Tower 1 and 2 also controlled demolition, Mossad false flag with Neo-cons. Military grade Nano-thermite cutting charges took down three buildings.
2. Oswald was patsy, JFK shot from opposite side. Multiple shooters, maybe Oswald never got a shot off. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Tague
3. No planes, there is no evidence of planes hitting anything on 9/11. Those passenger planes can't fly at 500 mph at sea level. Must have been cruise missiles.
The video footage must be doctored. Only other explanation is military transport plane was flown on advanced auto-pilot, doesn't explain 500 mph at sea level.
Flight 93 Shanksville, no plane crash, likely shot down in mid air.

 

This!

 

A few other points in regards to 9/11.

The indestructable black boxes that are fitted to each plane, magically disappeared.
WTC7, debris could not have cuased it to go the way it went down, I agree with @dmarsh , controlled demolition. If you look at some of the footage, and there is a lot out there, you will hear bangs before 'the planes hit' and also there is eye witness testimony of loud bangs before the buildings went down.

 

Agreed free-fall velocity is impossible if the floors provide any resistance at all, and concreate and steel in lower floors would be strong enough to support thousands of tons of structure above it. It cannot instantly lose 100% of its strength on multiple floors without explosives.

With regard to the planes entering the building look up 'butter physics'.


The planes are made of aluminum, a light and brittle metal, they are hitting 200+ columns of 4 inch thick high grade box steel, surrounded by concrete. Most of the planes should shatter and disintegrate without entering the building, in fact I would maybe even expected an engine to fall to the sidewalk. I would not expect wingtips to make hardly any impression on the building.

 

I've always disbelieved the official story of 9/11 and after looking further in to it I'm suprised there hasn't been a further investigation!

The problem has always been the flood of crazy stuff released to drown out the well thought out explainations and sensible arguments!

My favourite site for the questioning of news stories is www.whatreallyhappened.com

 

Worth a look