1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is this a bug : I do not need to apply NAT in order to go to ISP?

Discussion in 'General Cisco Certifications' started by kobem, Apr 1, 2011.

  1. kobem

    kobem Megabyte Poster

    791
    1
    50
    i couldn't solve this problem. The bizarre thing is that i can go to ISP without applying NAT on lab_B inside packet tracer. What i did was just running routing process at most. So, why should we map private into public IP addresses in this scenario? (in case where lab_B tracks through ISP and the remote host)


    http://rapidshare.com/files/455423588/Access_control_list_ornegim_NAT_yapamama_sorunu.pkt
     
    Certifications: CCNA
  2. billyr

    billyr Kilobyte Poster

    262
    20
    35
    I've not got packet tracer installed on this machine to take a look at the file.

    I would say though that to keep in mind that it's Packet Tracer that you are using and not a real ISPs network.
    As you know there would be no routes pointing back to RFC 1918 addresses from the ISPs, it's probably just the way someones set up the packet tracer network.
     
    Certifications: CCNP, CCSI, MCSE W2k/W2k3, MCITP_SA
    WIP: Taking it easy for a while.

Share This Page

Loading...