How does recruitment agency makes money?

Discussion in 'Employment & Jobs' started by Dave_unemployed, Jun 22, 2010.

  1. Dave_unemployed

    Dave_unemployed Nibble Poster

    57
    0
    14
    Sorry for asking a stupid question, just wondering how they make money...

    Once they get me a job, do they take a % off my pay?

    Dave
     
    Certifications: A+, N+, MCP and MCDST
    WIP: 70-680
  2. Adam Banner

    Adam Banner Poster Galore

     
  3. greenbrucelee
    Highly Decorated Member Award

    greenbrucelee Zettabyte Poster

    14,283
    254
    329
    Some of them work in different ways

    Some actually employ you and lease you to the company you are working for so to speak. So say you are getting £10 an hour your probably actually getting £18 pound and hour but the agency is taking the £8

    Some charge you a fee if you find employment through them

    Some charge the company through getting an employee for them for advertising their company

    Some do a mixture of all this.
     
    Certifications: A+, N+, MCDST, Security+, 70-270
    WIP: 70-620 or 70-680?
  4. BosonJosh

    BosonJosh Gigabyte Poster

    1,326
    28
    89
    As GBL said, it varies. The one I worked with to get a job at Transcender 10 years ago received a percentage of my annual salary as their fee for "finding me" for the company.
     
  5. Phoenix
    Honorary Member

    Phoenix 53656e696f7220 4d6f64

    5,726
    175
    221
    Josh' experience mirrors 100% of mine, every recruitment agency I have gone through gets a cut of my first year salary, sometimes up to 3 months (netting them a pretty tidy sum)

    i have never had to put up with the other ways, but the ones GBL lists do in fact exist, i'm generally wary of anything that costs ME money during the recruitment process.. :)
     
    Certifications: MCSE, MCITP, VCP
    WIP: > 0
  6. SimonD

    SimonD Terabyte Poster Forum Leader

    Top Poster
    of the Month

    2,500
    184
    174
    It actually depends on whether it's perm or contract.

    Pretty much spot on with what both Josh and Ryan have said for perm positions, for contract positions it's generally them charging you out at rate A, you getting rate B and them pocketing the difference (anywhere from 10 - 25%).

    One thing to be aware of with a perm role is that if you leave that role within (usually 3 months but it can be 1 year for more senior roles) the agency don't get their fee, or perhaps only a % of it rather than the full rate.

    As far as your pay is concerned, No, the fees 'should' be coming from the company and not you, after all the work was carried out on their behalf and not yours. Any agency that tries to take money from your salary for placing you in the role should be told to go f**k themselves.
     
    Certifications: CNA | CNE | CCNA | MCP | MCP+I | MCSE NT4 | MCSA 2003 | Security+ | MCSA:S 2003 | MCSE:S 2003 | MCTS:SCCM 2007 | MCTS:Win 7 | MCITP:EDA7 | MCITP:SA | MCITP:EA | MCTS:Hyper-V | VCP 4 | ITIL v3 Foundation | VCP 5 DCV | VCA 5 DCV | VCA 5 Cloud | VCA 5 WM | VCP 5 Cloud | VCA 5 NV
    WIP: VCAP
  7. BosonMichael
    Highly Decorated Member Award

    BosonMichael Yottabyte Poster

    19,136
    462
    374
    The one I used charged my permanent-employer-to-be a fee. I'm not sure how that fee was calculated - whether it was a flat rate or a percentage of my annual salary. However, the employer paid it off in three monthly payments. When a customer decided to hire me away from my employer after 10 months, my employer charged the customer the fee to recoup their losses. I then worked for that customer for another 10 months.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2010
    Certifications: CISSP, MCSE+I, MCSE: Security, MCSE: Messaging, MCDST, MCDBA, MCTS, OCP, CCNP, CCDP, CCNA Security, CCNA Voice, CNE, SCSA, Security+, Linux+, Server+, Network+, A+
    WIP: Just about everything!
  8. dmarsh

    dmarsh Terabyte Poster

    3,433
    201
    184
    Normally a flat fee for perm jobs, the basis of this is negotiated in advance with the agency before they carry out the search. The employer pays the fee, it should not affect your salary but there are exceptions, small companies may use money saved on recruiters to offer direct hires more.

    Contract jobs normally add a percentage to your daily rate and they pocket this difference, it can be anything from 5-50% depending on how unscrupulous they are. Normally its in the 15-25% range for IT contracts.

    50% can be common for manual labour jobs where you are filling a temp position for someone on leave.
     
    Certifications: CITP, BSc, HND, SCJP, SCJD, SCWCD, SCBCD, SCEA, N+, Sec+, Proj+, Server+, Linux+, MCTS, MCPD, MCSA, MCITP, CCDH
  9. JonnyMX

    JonnyMX Petabyte Poster

    5,239
    211
    236
    It always amazes me that, despite the recession and people being made redundant left, right and centre - that half the jobs you see online are for recruitment consultants (did I get it right this time?)

    It sort of makes me think that something is going wrong somewhere.

    We know that most places aren't recruiting. Private sector is watching the pennies and the public sector has a recruitment freeze on while they prepare for cuts.

    So what are they all doing, and why do agencies need so many of them?

    Well, one thing they're doing is spamming me with jobs I don't want or aren't qualified for. Personally I'm more tempted by the $10 million left to me by that dead president than I am by the thought of working as a cheese administrator in Slough.

    I suppose many agencies adopt the sales mentality. Place one applicant with a client each week or you're out sort of thing.

    I've worked with some very professional agencies, and I've worked with some terrible ones. We had one try to place a guy with us (for 10% of his annual salary) and when he turned up, he didn't even know what the job was. Turned out he was completely unqualified and didn't want it anyway. Very embarassing all round.

    :rolleyes:
     
    Certifications: MCT, MCTS, i-Net+, CIW CI, Prince2, MSP, MCSD
  10. Fergal1982

    Fergal1982 Petabyte Poster

    4,196
    171
    211
    Ah, let the Agency bashing begin once again.

    Really, does it actually matter to you? So long as you are happy with the salary you are being provided, what does it matter how they make their money (excepting those occassions where they try to charge you for finding you work)

    If the money is too little, barter for more or dont take the job.

    For reference, they generally agree a markup with the employer - usually a percentage of annual salary for permanent positions, or a percentage of the rate for ongoing roles

    Unscrupulousness doesnt come into it, the markup on any job is a contractual agreement between the employer and the agency. If the employer is happy to accept the presented markup, why is it unscrupulous? There are hundreds of agencies. Again if the employer isnt happy with the markup, they can go somewhere else.

    Not really sure this is the agency's fault, its your responsibility as the employer to ensure that the candidate you accept is up to scratch for your requirements. If they turned up sight unseen, then its the employers fault for not actually making to effort to ensure that they are acceptable.
     
    Certifications: ITIL Foundation; MCTS: Visual Studio Team Foundation Server 2010, Administration
    WIP: None at present
  11. JonnyMX

    JonnyMX Petabyte Poster

    5,239
    211
    236
    Partially.

    Yes, obviously the employer has the final word in recruiting the candidate. However, the entire point of using an agency (and paying them for their services) is for them to do some preliminary sifting and to send you suitable candidates.

    Just sending any old applicant without even discussing the role with them and matching them against the profile clearly is the agency's fault.
     
    Certifications: MCT, MCTS, i-Net+, CIW CI, Prince2, MSP, MCSD
  12. dmarsh

    dmarsh Terabyte Poster

    3,433
    201
    184
    I take it you've never contracted then, take it from someone with experience of the contract market, employers often set a price limit, recruiters then try to fill the position, the candidate is blind to the employers offer price, its common for recruiters to try to 'widen the middle', they do not care for the employer or the candidate. They are salesmen and middlemen in the true sense of the word, they generally offer very little value add, they seem to exist purely due to HR departments spurning the recruitment responsibility. While a 15% percentage fee may be fair they will get as large a percentage as they can and people unused to the process will get fleeced. Do you think its fair for a person to only get 50% of their earnings because of a con trick ? Do you not see the situation as potentially fundamentally parasitic ? Why you think gangmasters are licensed ?

    The better agencies will have a reasonably low set markup agreed with the employer often in return for sole supplier status, and that will be applied to your rate, good employers will also often enforce this to stop their employees getting screwed by agents.

    Well it is when the fundamental pitch of the agency is to add value to the employer and the candidate in the search process. They are supposed to add value by providing sufficient preliminary screening. Many recruiters profess to being 'experts in IT recruitment' etc. In reality they generally offer little value add to either party but just add to costs. Unfortunately theres little you can do about it as most HR departments refuse to recruit any other way, in fact i've know HR people in bed with agencies in a kickback type of arrangement.

    Its all part of maggies 'service economy' where nothing gets done and everything costs 300% more...
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2010
    Certifications: CITP, BSc, HND, SCJP, SCJD, SCWCD, SCBCD, SCEA, N+, Sec+, Proj+, Server+, Linux+, MCTS, MCPD, MCSA, MCITP, CCDH
  13. Fergal1982

    Fergal1982 Petabyte Poster

    4,196
    171
    211
    F*ck it, never mind.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2010
    Certifications: ITIL Foundation; MCTS: Visual Studio Team Foundation Server 2010, Administration
    WIP: None at present
  14. BosonMichael
    Highly Decorated Member Award

    BosonMichael Yottabyte Poster

    19,136
    462
    374
    Exactly this. When I asked my previous employer why he used a recruiter to fill the position rather than find someone on their own, he gave this exact reason.
     
    Certifications: CISSP, MCSE+I, MCSE: Security, MCSE: Messaging, MCDST, MCDBA, MCTS, OCP, CCNP, CCDP, CCNA Security, CCNA Voice, CNE, SCSA, Security+, Linux+, Server+, Network+, A+
    WIP: Just about everything!
  15. BosonMichael
    Highly Decorated Member Award

    BosonMichael Yottabyte Poster

    19,136
    462
    374
    This is great advice to anyone, regardless of whether they find a job on their own or through a recruiter.
     
    Certifications: CISSP, MCSE+I, MCSE: Security, MCSE: Messaging, MCDST, MCDBA, MCTS, OCP, CCNP, CCDP, CCNA Security, CCNA Voice, CNE, SCSA, Security+, Linux+, Server+, Network+, A+
    WIP: Just about everything!